Win/loss conditions in narrative board games

I haven't played board games lately. I was on vacation and most of the board games I have are too big to fit in a suitcase or to play on a table in a small vacation apartment. But this week I looked at two board games to decide what I wanted to buy.

The first is the Destinies game, which has received a lot of positive reviews on YouTube. It's from Lucky Duck Games, who previously made Chronicles of Crime, and works with the "milk a QR code to get information with your phone" technology. Only this time the story is a kind of dark medieval fantasy with witches and wolves. One of the reasons the game is so popular is that it's * very * accessible, the rules are simple, and there's not much to confuse. It's quick to set up, explain and play, even for beginners. Soon you will explore a tile-based map, interact with different locations and NPCs, find items, improve your skills and try to progress the story as you fulfill your "destiny" by following the two possible options you choose. from your card

What Destinies doesn't have, in one of the weirdest game design decisions I've ever seen, is a way to get lost. You cannot lose all health or even die. If you pass your skill test, the game will progress faster than if you fail, but that's the only difference. If you play alone with no time limit, the game will always end with your luck and your winnings. You can only choose one challenge mode, but only after round X does it tell you that you had bad luck in time and leave you out of the game. So why do you want to play? They can also play 2 or 3 players at the finish, but the first player to reach the finish line wins and the others lose and do not see a "good" ending for their story.

Due to this system, Destinies does not have a multiplayer cooperative mode. They cannot work together to overcome the challenges of the game because there are no challenges in the game. Each player follows their own destiny, which can overlap with that of another player, and explores the map for specific things, eg. three silver objects to kill the wolf to make a silver weapon. But the success and speed of this is above all a matter of luck, whether you can find silver containers on the market or not; You can decide to go north and find a silver object there, or it could happen that the silver object was south of you. You can get a high or low score on your skill test with a limited chance to mitigate the risks. If you don't mind playing games and all of that and immerse yourself in history, this can be a good experience. If you are a strategist / tactician who likes to learn how to play a good game, you will be very disappointed. Eventually, I decided that the game wasn't very interesting to me alone, and since there was no co-op, playing with my wife and I wasn't going to be interesting. So I didn't buy it.

Instead, I spent my own money funding Gamefound's Galzyr Lands . It's another story-based game that isn't very complex yet, but can be played cooperatively. Lands of Galzyr is much smoother than the story-based games I have today. You are an anthropomorphic animal that is exploring the open world. In many ways it is similar to Lands of Galzyr Destinies; there are no hit points. a character sheet in which you record your skills to be successful in controlling skills; a personal adventure to follow; collect items that can help you test the aforementioned skills; an app to tell the story and consequences of your decisions.

So why would I want Galzir land more than destinations, especially since I can purchase Amazon Destiny right now while I have to wait at least a year to produce and ship Galzir land? For some reason. Lands of Galzyr is playable in co-op and I'm sure my wife will like it. the skills management system is more interesting and I find it more tactical at first glance; but above all, the famous points system. Lands of Galzyr is not too long and is played in a limited number of sessions. but how much good or bad you have done is measured in a prestigious course. Not only do you see binary winning / losing opinions, but you also see how many reputation points you have earned against a target number. And your story doesn't end there. You can either start and continue another game directly, or "save" the game and continue at a later time, with the option that the decisions you make in this game affect the next session. If you have done a good preparation and this session has not served you well, perhaps you will quickly gain a lot of reputation points and perform much better in the next session. Your "gain" or "loss" does not end your story, nor does it make your story less good. The campaign will likely end somewhere at which point you'll have to restart the game, but you can play more sessions along the way.

In other words, at the end of a multiplayer game of Fates, one player will achieve his fate, have a "hard" victory and have a happy ending to his story, others will receive a "hard" defeat and fail. the conclusion of his story. In the Land of Galzirko, at the end of a multiplayer match, players will achieve a "smooth" win or defeat together, earning a reputation for scoring, simply failing or doing very badly, and no fame. ; but the fame counter goes to zero as the stories and adventures advance. There are no negative consequences for the loss, just a few ideas you can do better next time. Lands of Galzyr's soft win / loss system is much better suited for a story-based adventure game than Destinies' hard system. I am looking forward to playing Galzir Landes, although I will have to wait at least a year to play it.

PS Lands of Galzyr crowdfunding is 27 days away and the game is already 182% funded.

tobold's blog

Board Games with Apps

In my previous post, I mentioned two board games that use programs. Yesterday, Fantasy Flight Games released one of the most controversial games of the year, Descent: Legends of the Dark, and it's also based on software. The game currently has 308 user reviews on BoardGameGeek, where 148 are 10 and 107 are 1 . And it seems that neither 10 nor 1 is about the game, it's a hybrid of a board / video game. Some people who like board games don't like using apps, and some people who like video games don't like using a relatively expensive board game box full of scenery and miniatures. As someone who loves board games and video games, here's my take on the matter.

First, let me say that I have Gloomhaven, an app-only board game. When I play it, I use two third-party apps: Gloomhaven Helper to track the battle and Forteller to add sound. My wife and I love two player story games. So either we both try to read the text at the same time, or one of us has to read the text to the other, or we use an app that reads the text for us. It's pretty easy to see that having an app that reads history is a plus, not a disadvantage. Depending on how you use the app to track various game scores, your mileage may vary. I think for a complex game like Gloomhaven this could be useful.

Now story games that don't rely on software have a storybook in a box. It often works like a Choose Your Own Adventure book: you are given an initial phase and then prompted to move to another phase depending on your choice or the result of a skill test, e.g. Such a book gives you maximum freedom to cheat if you want. You can continue reading, go back if you don't like the result, etc. Lands of Galzyr , which I mentioned in a previous post, has a back button, so if you make an innocent mistake *or* want to cheat, you can go back. Also mentioned Destinies have no back button. Some may welcome the removal of the cheat, but if you can't undo it, it's annoying to accidentally hit the wrong button.

I really don't like apps used for secret information. In simple board games, you not only have to make decisions and roll dice, but you also check whether the dice rolls are successful or not. I love Lands of Galzyr, which always tells you whether the skill check is easy, medium, or hard before you decide what to do and roll the dice. I don't like the program in Destinies where this information is hidden from you, you go in blindly, enter the results into the program and then determine if what you throw is good enough. There are a number of other uses for hidden information where Destinies monitors something and changes the results based on it without telling you why. I prefer transparency.

In Lands of Galzyr, the program effectively replaces the book, thus saving the tree. In Destinies, as well as previous games from Fantasy Flight Games such as the new Descent game and Journeys in Middle -earth, the app also provides a game map. You end up with the odd situation where you basically have two copies of the board: a physical one on your table with the tiles and a virtual one in the program that tells you how to place the tiles. I have to say I'm not a fan. You spend a lot of time comparing the two versions of the map and wonder why you need the physical version. If you're playing solo, you can *only* play Destinies with a program card. For now, only cards with a player mat and physical game objects remind you that you're playing a board game.

In conclusion, I'm not totally against the use of apps in board games, but I like to limit their use to controlling the story (and reading aloud if possible). If I wanted a game where important game mechanics like measuring success or how the game decides what to do next are mostly hidden from the player, I'd play a pure video game. And no, I'm not buying Descent: Legends of the Dark. Not only because I use one program more than I'd like, but also because the 3D landscape seems buggy and unstable to me, and the $180 price tag is pretty high.

Tobold's blog

Simulating the D&D experience

There are many board games and video games that use the "RPG" label. However, they never replicate the same experience that you can play in a tabletop RPG like Dangeons and Dragons. This is mainly due to the lack of a dungeon master: In D&D you can announce every imaginable step and a good dungeon master will at least let you try and ask you for a skill test. So yes, in D&D you can *jump off the porch* and attack trolls from above, even if that action isn't part of the quest module your party is playing. You can't do this in a board game or video game unless you have a "leap over the chandelier" listed.

Still, let's look at some D&D gameplay elements that can be modeled with a board game or video game:

• A story where your choices affect the outcome.
• Characters with traits and abilities.
• Verbs whose success depends on character traits and skills.
• Bound by combat, traits, and power.
• Rewards in the form of experience/levels or items that usually increase a character's stats and skills.

When you play a video game like Baldur's Gate 3, you get all of these elements. So if you don't think about the list of possible actions coded in the game, you at least have a very D&D-like experience. To a certain extent, these games try to give you the illusion that your choices affect the outcome and may have a limited number of slightly different outcomes. But sometimes the front is too thin, and if you play the game a second time, you'll notice many elements of the story that you can't change even if you try to make a different choice. *Spoiler alert* In Baldur's Gate 3, the mind-flare nautiloid "ship" will *always* crash and end up in the same place as you, no matter what you choose in this early phase of the game.

In board games, the storyline is sometimes more linear and/or shorter. Most board games have no apps and are limited to telling visual stories. So if there is a story, it is limited to reading text aloud. For obvious reasons, you don't want the text to be too long, at least when the game has multiple players. I just ordered Legacy of Dragonholt, which is quite an expensive book with a sheet of Choose Your Own Adventure character; I'll probably play this alone because if I played with my wife I would have to read a lot of songs. But at least Legacy of Dragonholt has a lot of decision points, and the skills you choose when creating your character will determine what you can do. So if you create an orc fighter or a dwarven alchemist, you'll get different abilities and therefore different options, even if you're playing the same story. The only thing missing in my opinion is the dice roll and efficiency control system. Other people might like it if you go for stealth power, you will still succeed if stealth is actually an alternative to history.

I do like board games when they're story-driven, but that's definitely a matter of taste. Yesterday I mentioned the new Descent: Legends of the Dark that I will not be buying. But it's based on my choice; If you're looking for a game that features mostly tactical battles and a wide range of character development systems with lots of skills and abilities, then New Descent might be the game for you. You still have to consider how much the app bothers you, whether the price of ট্যাগ 175 is too much for you and how satisfied you are with the 3D cardboard terrain. But if you want a dungeon crawler with a nice miniature and a decent strategic combat system to start with, I wouldn't blow Decent. Especially if you prefer dice-based combat over card-based combat in GrimHarbar.

I still think Lands of Galzar would come very close to a lightweight two player D&D style game for me and my wife. However, this game is of course still crowdfunded, and it will be at least another year before I can test that guess. Baldur's Gate 3 will also be released next year, although you can buy the game and play the beta now. So in terms of games, I'd recommend Solasta: Crown of the Magistrate if you prefer a previously released game that's pretty close to D&D.

Tobold's blog

Agemonia

Kaulinan dewan Agemonia ayeuna vs Kickstarter kira-kira dua dinten jauh ti waktos tulisan ieu disusun. Kuring ngadukung ieu saatos ningali prototipe dilakukeun dina YouTube. Ieu saluyu sareng fitur kaulinan dewan karesep kuring.

• Kasebut nyaéta dimungkinkeun pikeun maénkeun nyalira atanapi sareng 2 jalma (dina hal ieu dugi ka 4 jalma saleresna)
• Balukar tina mékanika kaulinan anu teu jelas sareng pilihan anu teu jelas
• Ngembangkeun kabiasaan
• Kampanye kalayan sajarah kompléks

Di sagigireun sarat dasar ieu, aya hal séjén anu kuring resep pisan ngeunaan kanyeri. Anjeun tiasa méakkeun € 50 tambahan pikeun meunang kamar gantina, tapi ieu teu diperlukeun. Salajengna, kuring muji gaya "perang-ti-buku-peta" sapertos Jaws of the Lion sabab éta langkung gancang nyetél tibatan kaulinan dumasar-ubin sareng pamustunganana nawiskeun seueur épék visual. Anu pamungkas, abdi resep dadu, utamana lamun gulung parah, cet husus kalawan sababaraha métode moisturizing.

Ngadangukeun sababaraha urang dina YouTube ngawangkong ngeunaan kaulinan dewan jeung kaulinan kickboxer jeung mikir yén proyék mangrupa lauk, Kuring geus bisa ngarojong sababaraha proyék nu geus dijieun jadi jauh. Kadang-kadang telat, tapi sadayana parantos sumping. Najan kitu, anjeun kudu nyaman Mayar 9999 jeung up pikeun kaulinan, nu bakal dileupaskeun dina bulan Désémber 2022. Kaulinan dewan abdi diatur sakumaha uap urang Game abdi teu goréng acan, tapi lamun kuring nempo eta on Kickstarter, Kuring meureun ngarasakeun kaulinan. loba, tapi senang nu geus maot kana waktu. Kaulinan bener-bener kaluar.

Nanging, pikeun kuring, tren umum nuju kana kaulinan dewan unggal ayeuna. Dina tilu minggu Kaula bade Spiel di Essen, konferensi dewan kaulinan pangbadagna di Éropa. Sareng kuring henteu acan kadinya dina sababaraha dekade. karir kaulinan kuring dimimitian ku kaulinan dewan, tapi ieu didominasi ku kartu-na-pensil kaulinan peran-maén jeung kaulinan komputer. Jigana Kickstarter ieu credited pikeun nyieun kaulinan dewan leuwih kompleks jeung metot diaksés ka panongton leutik. Agemonia ayeuna gaduh 1632 anggota. Ieu persis tipe pasar nu kaulinan dewan sakola heubeul nyoba ngawula di pasar ritel.

Kuring nyobian janten selektif. Kuring ayeuna gaduh kaulinan dewan anu dirojong ku Kickstarter (7. Citadel, Radgost Forest, Glory 2nd édisi, Arydia and Agemonia) jeung 3 kaulinan on Gamefound (Bardsung, Hexplore It: The Domain of Mirza Noctis, Lands of Galzyr). Sareng kuring diajar ngajauhan pesen "umum" anu pikaresepeun pisan. Aranjeunna masihan anjeun langkung kasempetan maén ti anjeun tiasa maén. Alatan inflasi tinggi jeung kanyataan yén jalma anu nyieun proyék on Kickstarter kudu mayar harga taun hareup, pengiriman barang gancang, pausahaan kaulinan anu leuwih mahal ti taun ka tukang. Aya ogé tren anu kuring benci yén sababaraha kaulinan henteu deui ngajanjikeun "kotak dasar" dina harga anu berpatutan, tapi versi dasar anu anjeun tiasa mésér hadir kalayan seueur miniatur sareng elemen anu saé. Contona, tempo sadaya ieu sarta pasar pisan leutik, biaya hiburan dewan kaulinan loba nu leuwih luhur ti lolobana kaulinan PC. Sanajan kitu, kadang mangpaat pikeun mindahkeun dadu sarta maénkeun kalayan potongan fisik kaulinan.

Blog Tobolld

MicroMacro - Crime City

I call this post a board game, but the name is debatable. MicroMacro - Crime City is a big city map game that doesn't use boards or cards. In fact, playing cards against the wall can be much easier than throwing them around on the table. But even though it's very different from any board game I've ever seen, MicroMacro is a fantastic detective game. It's easier to show than to explain, so thanks, there are online displays .

However, MicroMacro returns to Mana Vali/Waldo 's book. The book is part of the challenge of finding a specific character in a large image filled with many other characters. However, in the Waldensian book, the work ends only with micro-macro. Multi-character city maps are not instant images, time passes as you move from one place to another. This way you will be able to find the same character more than once on the map and follow his story. Often the direction a character is moving is a hint as to where the previous image in the series and the next image are.

In this case, the game will find cards that ask questions about the plot. For example, you may first be asked to identify a specific crime scene and make some general recommendations; You may then be asked where the victim has been in the past or where the perpetrator has gone. Having traced all these episodes in time, you will finally find out the whole history of the crime. As I said, it's better to play the demo above to understand the principle.

MicroMacro is a type of game that you can take with you to family get-togethers during the upcoming holidays. Almost anyone can play. After several complaints, the developer added age restrictions for various issues; So if you have a child who doesn't want to deal with murder or betrayal, you can get a non-critical charge. But when a small exhibition of coats opens somewhere on the map, everything is very harmful and children over 10 years old should not be surprised. The main attraction of the macro is that you can find people who have never played board games. And this is a very positive experience, and everyone, regardless of age, always feels happy and smart when they agree to the card.

The game already has two versions: Crime City and Crime City - Full House. In Europe, it costs between 20 and 25 ውሮፓ, but Amazon.com says the game is hard to find in North America. If you want to play alone, with your adult or the whole family, I recommend this game.

Tobold's blog

Worst of both worlds?

I recently heard about a board game called Paolo, which won the “Game of the Year ” award. And I'm not 100% sure I want it. On the one hand, playing alone or together, it meets my criteria for some kind of development and interesting options. On the other hand, I'm not sure if this game can tell a story without words. I'm not a big fan of abstract games. Critics, however, say that Pale mastered the art of storytelling. So before I bought this game, I thought of a way to try this.

I learned that Paleo is free to play on Tabletopia online . I've never used Tabletopia or similar software like Tabletop Simulator. Basically, I heard about Tabletop Simulator and most of the games are "fan made", which I think are "hacked". But the games on Tabletopia are public releases made by the developer, which makes this option even more interesting (your mileage may vary.)

All of this ends as developer Paolo thought when you made the game available for free. Remember, if you live in North America and you're finding it really hard to get there, you might consider ordering the game on Amazon.com for $40. You can find English rule books online , and the card names aren't relevant to the game, so it doesn't matter what the foreign language is.

But paleo's experience at Tabletopia taught me why developers are willing to play for free and why I wouldn't pay $99 per year for a gold subscription that lets me play non-free games. Board games seem very difficult and embarrassing in simulation software. It combines board game crashes, such as managing all components and all accounting, with computer game crashes, losing cards and dice. After playing Paleon, I decided that I would definitely choose to play the physical version, even alone, but especially with my wife.

As mentioned recently, I love digital versions of board games like Gloomhaven. However, the user interface of this software is designed to automate some game mechanics. I've seen it play independent digital field games, when I select an option on the map, the game will automatically add and remove resources and place cards in the correct pile. But dragging all your resources, tokens and cards by hand to Tabletopia isn't very fast. And when I have to do everything by hand, I choose the right physical version.

Tobold's Blog

We need more Jaws of the Lion

So yesterday I got a copy of the Paleo board game for 40 euros (including shipping) from Amazon. Another Kickstarter board game called Mythwind was launched yesterday. If you compare the images of the Paleo և Mythwind (main game) components, the physical number of the game is roughly the same with both. But Mythwind in its most basic version costs 72 euros + 22 euros for shipping. If you buy it internally, if you add a miniature Figure 5, you will pay 150 euros, including shipping. And honestly, I don’t think it’s going to be 2-4 times more fun with Mythwind than with Paleo.

When it comes to board games, especially crowdfunding board games, there is a certain trend in 2021 that the value of money is significantly worse than in previous years. There are several reasons for this. First, VAT does not apply to Kickstarter games. The small volumes, plus the subtle excitement that customers were “gifted” money in exchange for a “reward,” held on to tax auditors for a while, but no longer. For Europe, this directly means that everything is going up by around 20%. Another factor is that most board games are made in China and this year shipping costs from China have risen significantly. And finally, Kickstarter’s specific business model, where you now pay և to get your products later, means that companies need to take inflation into account և to sell their products at next year’s prices. which was not possible when inflation was very low, but which is becoming increasingly important today.

These trends do not coincide with another trend: duxification. One of the reasons why Mythwind is more expensive than Paleo is that the trays of Paleo characters are made of 2D cardboard, while Mythwind is made of 3D plastic. This has its value. That’s also an advantage, but not everyone needs nicer ingredients. This year I was very impressed with the Fall game. Legends of the Dark was $ 175 in exchange for MSRP. Yes, the game has beautiful little high quality images և 3D Landscape. But many prefer 2D space և cardboard blocks, which means the game is worth half the price. Of course, different people have different amounts of income, some can easily afford $ 175 board games. But I can’t compare that to the AAA PC game, which will probably give you the same entertainment / time value as a third party. even cheaper if you wait a while to release it.

Gloomhaven is a great example for me. Jaws of the Lion, offering the usual alternative to Gloomhaven at mid-price. Fewer components, but the same basic behavior, and the added advantage of a faster setup is cheaper than the original. I would buy Descent. Jaws of the Lion, but the original is too rich for me. In fact, I want to ask board game manufacturers to always offer a cardboard version instead of a miniature version. Not everyone appreciates miniatures equally, not everyone knows how to paint, so to some extent, monochromatic miniatures are worse than colored cardboard. they are stationary.

Tobold's blog

Hacking the win condition in your head

So I played the first game of the new board game I got this week, Paleo, alone and quickly lost. Then I kept playing until I met the win condition. Paleo uses a relatively simple algorithm to determine wins and losses: you get 5 "winner" points before you get 5 "loser" points. However, the lack of point loss counters (skulls) does not prevent you from continuing to play after reaching 5 skulls. Standing on 5 heads makes sense if you want a faster game. But at some point, if you don't want to stop and start over after growing your tribe, another win condition also makes sense: play until you win and try to do it with as few skulls as possible. Since Paleo is a game that tends to get better with experience, if you keep repeating the same scenario over and over, you're more likely to do it with fewer skulls and at least 5 at a time.

In competitive games, other players are guaranteed to win. In single player and co-op games where you play against the system (or AI), victory is conditional. It's a bit like jumping high in a stadium alone: ​​what is victory? If you jump higher than before, even if it's much lower than the world record, it would be enough for most people.

The great thing about tabletop games is that there isn't a computer that throws you off course with the "Game Over" screen. It is up to you to follow the suggested course of action when you reach a state of victory or defeat. But once you understand that the terms winning or losing are arbitrary, you can decide to change them up based on what you like best. Some people like to start over, while others like to keep playing.

I think over time I'll get better at paddling, getting past the first 'easy' level and moving on to intermediate and harder. But if I didn't improve and couldn't manage a certain level of difficulty, I wouldn't want to miss these last very difficult stages. Although I find it "very difficult" to follow the developers' arbitrary rules, I prefer to change the win/loss conditions and play difficult scenarios. I'm also planning to go to Spiel Essen 2021 in a week and maybe get an extension for Paleo. Getting harder DLCs for a game you haven't beaten would be foolish. but if for some reason the paleo expansion is too difficult, "hacking" the win condition is an obvious way to solve the problem.

Tobold's block

Spiel Essen 2021

The Spiel in Essen is the largest board game fair in Europe. It usually happens every year but definitely not last year. And since recently rediscovering my love for board games, I haven't really been there in three decades. But this year I left. Unfortunately Saturday was the worst day but work didn't allow me to go on the first day which is quieter. I might do it next year. Overall it worked: I bought 4 games: the New Beginnings Paleo expansion pack, which was released on the first day of the convention; Fates plus Sea of ​​Sand expansion, a game I doubted but then got a conditional discount. Suspects, a new card-based detective game; And finally Mortum. Medieval Detective, a game I had never heard of before but was interested in learning Witcher style detective stories.

The main downside is that after a full day at the conference, I'm not sure I've seen everything, but my legs hurt a lot to keep going. As part of the outbreak, organizers could easily push the stands to the side, leaving unused space behind the halls. But to enter you needed at least a Covid certificate. I couldn't play as many games as I wanted, it seemed easier for small groups than offering to show someone their game. . So I joined other bands, played Paper Dungeons and Oathsworn. I don't know if I'll get those games later. But even though I couldn't play much, I was given very brief explanations of the games to see if I was interested. Malhya can be crucial, և it seems to me that the game has been in development for a long time since 2018 and even Kickstarter hasn't launched yet.

I was a little embarrassed as I like themed, storytelling games that like to be played together. But in the European table convention, surprisingly, you see the most competitive European games with all kinds of staff building a table with other heavy mechanical gaming elements. Even destinies, guided by stories, are competitive. I have to play with my wife to see how much it bothers us, otherwise I can just play. Only one of the games I sponsored was presented at the conference (Nova Aetas Renaissance). I'd love to see more, at least check them out while waiting for the Kickstarters release.

Anyway, I've gone too far. I booked an airport hotel 15 minutes south of convention which was much cheaper than hotels further afield. I was pleasantly surprised to find that I only paid $6 a day for parking at the convention center. And I only paid 175 euros for the games I bought. I even saved some money by eating out of convention, but it was more about relaxing and putting the toys back in the car so I didn't have to take them out. Overall I had a great time but was glad I booked a hotel rather than heading home after a long conference.

Tobold's blog

Games are too cheap, or why I don't need a board game table

Conventional economic theory assumes that when the price of a product increases, its demand will decrease. The exception to this rule is Veblen products , and that usually applies to certain luxury items: people want them *because* they are so expensive, because thus owning them is a great status symbol. I spent an entire day at a board gaming conference yesterday, and one Veblen product is completely different: a Wyrmwood gaming table that's over 8,500 years old. Sure, there are "cheap" examples that cost less than $1,000, but the ones I saw at the conference cost over $2,000 and one for $13,500. Yes, it's nice to see a table as tall as a used table, but I'm sure I could furnish the whole house if I bought furniture from IKEA for that kind of money.

The reason these tables are different is because there's nothing really valuable at the conference. Yes, you can "upgrade" your board game, for example by buying metal parts to replace the cardboard parts that came with your game. You might be able to double the price of your board game by making it fancy, but it's still not that expensive. There are very few games at convention that cost over $100, and a lot of games that cost $50 or less (all the games I bought were). The most expensive board game I know of is Kingdom Death Monster, 350 gems for the original box and precious metal chess doesn't count. Some of the all-inclusive Kickstarter promises are more expensive, but then you get tons of boxes, expansions, and thumbnails from the game. So how much money do you really spend on your board game hobby?

A board game table has one main feature: a low-key indoor play area, usually with some sort of soft covering, such as felt or neoprene. Advantages: The soft playing surface makes it easy to pick up cards or other playing objects and the fence around the playing field prevents dice or other playing material from falling to the floor. Of course you can do what I did and place the soft material playmat (I used Chesapeake Megamate vinyl) on a regular table and don't roll the dice too hard or use the dice tray. Personally, I sit at a board game table and find fences uncomfortable, especially when trying to play a game that requires you to write something down. I don't really understand what an expensive gaming table would do for my solution. So my only explanation is that people buy board game tables *because* they are expensive. Buy something really nice for yourself or impress a board game group. I decided I didn't need it. And with this money, which saved me from this decision, I will buy a board game for ten years.

Tobold's blog

Destinies - kind of a review

I wrote a blog post in August about why I do not want to buy Destinies . On Saturday, however, I bought the game, as well as the expansion (at 70 euros, less than it would cost me to buy online) at the Spiel store in Essen. And on Sunday I played a game with my wife to see if we would like to play together and if I would prefer to play alone. In the end, we both liked it and decided to play together, but we did not like it, I will tell you later.

But first I want to talk about why I changed my mind about Destinies. Because it has to do with understanding what I'm looking for in games. In Spiel I had the opportunity to play Paper Dungeons , a "dungeon scroller" that you can spin and type. And it didn’t really excite me. Not that it's a bad game, but because of the main game cycle, this game shares most of the games I saw at the Spiel convention: at each stage, by combining random elements and player decisions, each player manipulates the elements of the game and writing. they (usually in the "fold and write" or "twist and write" genres, the voice is written on a piece of paper, while in other games the voice is represented by meeps and dice on the board); at the end of the match each player changes his record into points; the player with the most points wins. Although Paper Dungeons is technically a prison exploration, there is no narrative experience or step-by-step exploration here.

When you see Spiel Essen's hottest game on BoardGameGeek , it all works that way. There are many different mechanics such as worker placement, mapping, tile placement or engine / office building. But always the decisions of the players change the elements of the game, which are converted into points at the end of the game and whoever has scored the most points wins. I do not really like. I play to gain experience, not to "beat" someone. The most popular convention game, Cueball, looks like this . Difficult, right? The "game" is to figure out these complex graphics and make the move that will ultimately maximize your points. Paper dungeons look like this , both of which are completely different, but again the same task: to understand the complex state of the game and to be able to make a move that will ultimately maximize your points.

How to win in such a contest? There is usually little chance, but if not everyone also understands the game, the degree of understanding is the best indication of who is winning. If you play one of these games for the first time against someone who has played it three times before, that player will almost certainly win. The consequence of winning by understanding is that no one explains their movements; you do not want to tell other players your strategy and why you think doing this or that action is better than what they did. And because of the complexity and ignorance of other players' strategy, you are often surprised by the end result; you thought you were having fun, but you ended up last, or vice versa. You barely understand the full implications of the move you just made, and usually much less than the move other players make. It's all very abstract and all the big surprises end when the points are counted.

I prefer games where every move is an experience, preferably shared with other players. And at least at Spiel, which is a European board game convention, these "American" themed games are rare compared to abstract "euro" point games. I did not buy Destinies because I thought it was the perfect game, but because there were not many games in the style I liked. It's better to buy a game with a strong story every turn and some disadvantages than an abstract European game where the story is not part of every turn I do.

The good news is that Destinies is extremely narratively strong. Almost every turn is a sequence of discoveries, descriptive decisions, throwing the dice to determine success, and discovering the consequences of combining your decision and the results of the dice. This fits in with the description of an "RPG in a box" where the application acts as the pastor. There is also some value in seeing other players' movements, as long as each result is read aloud, as what the other player encounters can give you clues about your goals.

The bad news is that the narrative experience of Destinies is somewhat at odds with the game designer's decision to make the game competitive. To explain it better, the rest of the post will contain heavy treats for the base game entry scenario, you have been warned! Destinies is primarily designed for three players, each playing one of the three main story characters. Each player / character tries to fulfill their "destination". But the fates are mutually exclusive. In the opening storyline at the beginning of the game it is reported that the village is threatened by a wolf and that the mayor has gone missing. Each player has additional hidden information: the nobleman wants to look just like a hero defeating the wolf; the witch is the mayor's mother and believes the wolf is her son, cursed by the witch; the hunter is the witch's lover and knows she wanted to get rid of her husband by turning him into a wolf, this spell only worked half. Each character has two different ways to achieve their fate: the nobleman can collect silver items to get silver weapons to kill the wolf, or organize a mob to help the villagers; the witch can help the villagers to help her break the curse or collect ritual objects to break the spell itself; and the hunter could raise money to kill a wolf with a silver weapon or collect ritual objects to help a witch cast a spell. Therefore, by designing the story, one player's victory prevents the other player (s) from reaching the goal.

In a three-player game, player 1 can choose between paths A and B, player 2 can choose between paths B and C, and player 3 can choose between paths C and A. Ideally, each player chooses a different path. . But according to statistics, if everyone chooses a path at random, in 75% of cases two players will choose the same path and get in each other's path, and the third player will win without resistance. You can change paths in the middle of the game, but you will definitely waste time, which will reduce your chances of winning. In a two-player game, the chance is fifty percent that both players have the same or different goals. And since everyone can see when the first player gets their first silver / ritual / resident item, the second player can change targets if necessary. So for me the game works better with 2 players than with 3.

At the beginning of the game, however, you have no idea where the items you need to collect are located unless you have already played the script. And I would not recommend playing the same scenario twice, the game works best when not all players know what scenario they are playing and everyone has a sense of exploration and discovery. But if no one knows the scenario, then the "victory" of the game has a pretty big chunk of luck. Yes, sometimes you have suggestions, for example if you want to gather the villagers, it makes sense to stay in the village and talk to the people there. But more often than not, you do not know where the items you are looking for are hiding, and you end up more or less randomly deciding which direction to go. I don't usually care about randomness and dice rolls in RPGs, but it's for cooperative games where random outcomes are just added to the story and you "fail". In Destinies with Mutually Exclusive Destinies, if one player wins, the other players are "punished" by having a poor story ending, which they have to endure passively. Only the winner has the pleasure of seeing his story to the end.

If you want, you can just play Destiny. Or you play on a timer, which means if you do not arrive at your destination on time, you can play the scenario again by doing the information you have already learned, and almost automatically do better. Or, if you do not like to do anything over, play in scout mode, which simply means there are absolutely no losing states, and play until you reach your destination. The storylines are interesting enough to apply the game to a single player. but in terms of pure game mechanics, none of the single player options feel satisfying.

Since the base game has 5 scenarios and the expansion has 3, and the script editor and player-created content have yet to be released, my plan is to play this game 8 times in 2-player mode with my wife. Since every move is interesting, the only downside is the pain of disappointment that one of us will inevitably experience when the script is missing. But, since it is "competitive", there are not many opportunities in the game for one player to ruin the other's game, except to accidentally reach the first base, when both players have accidentally chosen the same path. So in general we both do not play competitively or together, but enjoy exploration and discovery at the same time. And that joy of discovery is strong enough to keep the game going, so it does not bother us too much when one of us inevitably fails to fulfill our destiny. We would like to have a fully collaborative version where players work together more towards a common destiny. Yet Destinies is a fun game for both of you.

Tobold's blog

Games are too expensive, or why I don't need more bones

She wrote on Sunday that they sell for ten or hundreds of dollars at the main box office. However, there is also an expansion. I TRIED IT և I have an original game full of bones for about $400. If you think it's too much , I have proof that it still doesn't work!

Many bones, even the simplest ones, are now a collection of luxury items. If you throw a whole bottle of soda into it while playing, any other board game will be completely destroyed. Not a lot of bones All parts are neoprene or plastic - toy will be washed and dried: Fresh. And the indestructible part of the game has its price. So you can promise $85 for a whole new *or* $130 for the original bone, *or* $90 for separate player-quality paragraphs for less players և much more. GameGeek is a top 40 board game, I'd say you got a good deal. I would recommend their neoprene dice tray so there are no wrinkles, and instead protect the safe cocktail dice.

But it is very easy to get into this game and search for more details. I bought a lot of bones. And now, with a commitment of 1,100 for 151 public bids, it's definitely ending playing many games. How do you play with 17 characters? Especially since not everyone plays once before going to it. I have 7 of them չեմ I haven't played them yet $1100 Pledge the game Never risk playing, because choosing a character, dictator - law to play is a very difficult task. There are many legal variations on the general agreement, which can have many boxes which can be confusing.

From an economic point of view, it's an easy comeback issue. Double the value of the game is twice the fun, but twice as much fun. Although you have a new character fighting a new dictator, and a new villain in a new battle, the initial experience is still the same as the main game. Any great game, but how often do you want to play it? So it is good to have a large amount of healthy bone marrow. There are a lot of good things here.

Tobold's Blog:

How to get a Kingdom Death: Monster - like experience at 10% of the cost

I apologize to those who are not very interested in the content of board games, but spend a weekend at a table games exhibition, this is a topic that worries me a lot. So in the last post, I talked about a game that has a lot of value for the main box, the government death monster. And because I don't know much about the game, I've tested some reviews and ways to find out what the game is about (well, I didn't play it * because it lasts forever).

The Death of the Kingdom is a game played by survivors of a low-tech tribe. For example, very low technology, the starting point is a sharp rock, and I consider it as a bone knife, it is simply a sharp bone, a great improvement. There are different levels of the game, and on one level you change the cards to face different events, and on the other you fight monsters. People love the game.

Unfortunately, the Kingdom of Death monster costs only $ 400 for the main game, although there are currently $ 350 special games on sale . What if you can't afford it and want the same experience for something around $ 40 instead of $ 400? This year's Paleo is not too far away and only costs $ 40 (at least importing it into the US in Europe can cost you more.)

Of course, a $ 40 Paleo doesn't offer exactly the same game as $ 400 Kingdom Death: a monster game, but you get to play a game against a remnant of a very low-tech tribe; And you gain experience turning the letters to find different events, which leads to the development story of the game. It's not a tactical "boss warrior" battle in Paleo, but it has basic combat mechanics, and in the end you get gear from the skins, rocks, and wood you get. Paleo scratches the co-existence game where random events can kill you, but you can only defeat them if you gradually develop your tribe's weapons and abilities. In the death of the kingdom, the monster will do this in part from the time and money required for the same experience.

Personally, I love Paleon. And the death of the kingdom is not easy because I think it is expensive and put it on the table because it does not buy the monster. The Death of the Kingdom Monster is a way of life more than a board game. Paolo is a game that can be described in 10 minutes and one night with friends. With the Death of a Monster in the United Kingdom, you can complete the game of paleo in the time required for a full flash year. Of course, different people have different needs for games, but I want to make it clear that there is a faster and cheaper option.

Tobolld Blog

How long should a board game campaign be?

This weekend I was playing Destinies with my wife and a Gloomhaven digital soloist. On the one hand, there are two extremes, given the length of their campaign. There are a total of 5 scenarios in the Basic Destinations box and another 3 in the expansion. The basic Gloomhaven box has 95 scenarios. A dollar for the stage, Grimharbour has a much better value. But does it matter?

When my wife and I played non-digital Darkhaven, we played 16 scenarios before we lost interest and moved on. As a board game Gloomhaven is difficult to control and not an easy game. A lot of people didn’t finish the campaign. I don’t know if I’ll get to that digitally first, where setup is obviously a lot easier.

Grimharbor not only has more stories than The Fates, it has more repetition in each story. It is useless to repeat the story of Destinies, as the game is mostly about exploration, as it usually tries to find certain elements. Even if you vaguely remember where the elements of the previous game were, you will complete the game faster by defeating the first player who fulfills his goal.

Destiny isn’t a very deep game, but it’s fun to go through a story you don’t know yet. Since the basic structure of each scenario is the same and only the story changes, it is likely that you will not feel hard to play again after playing 5 scenarios from the basic scenario. It’s not that bad when you both feel like you’re running out of content and running out of content at the same time. Gloomy Harbor is like the albatross on the necks of many board players, a great game that we will never finish. I didn’t save Frosthaven because it would be roughly the same and I knew I would never end up there.

I wouldn’t say Destinies is a great game. The writing is a bit blurry in some places, the mechanics of the game are too simple for my liking, and if you’re not playing yourself, you should be quick to get there as soon as possible. as well as a game of exploration and storytelling for its purpose. But Destinies came to the table quickly, my wife and I easily passed the story in the evening and didn’t have to worry about when it was over and it was all over. Maybe board games don’t have to be that much.

Tobold's blog

Skyrim and market fragmentation

I made another board game on Gamefound (a Kickstarter competitor) ፡ Re Elder Scrolls V ፡ Clear Skyrim Adventure Game . From the big name, you might guess that the Skyrim video game is a version of a board game. As a fan of video games and board games, that sounds like a spectacle, right? But it's actually more complicated.

I'm not a big fan of video games and board games. I'm a fan of video games and I'm a fan of board games. One of the best and newest computer games of the year is Forza Horizon 5, which I will never play. I also don't play high-end board games like Wingspan or Terraforming Mars. I prefer relatively slow games where you have time to think about video games. I don't like games that slowly build to victory at the end of board games, but I prefer games where every step equals an adventure.

As a result, I'm one of the few PC gamers who really dislikes Skyrim. Steam last played in December 2011 and it says I played 21 hours. Just know what the game is about, and the action RPG style was not for me. Skyrim, on the other hand, is a fun board game because it's one of my favorite little board games that tells a story, in this case using multiple tasks and setting cards. My recent visit to the board game shows that the games are few. I once watched a game on YouTube and found it to be a fun adventure to navigate the map, explore dungeons, complete quests, and level up your character.

That said, I'm not a huge Gamefound fan for the Skyrim board game. I took a basic deposit of 68 pounds (80 euros/90 dollars), but if you take into account the postage, it will already be more than 100 euros. But the company will push you to take luxury offers two to three times more expensive. Activities that I have never seen on Kickstarter or Gamefound before, the main promise is almost no goals. I even get basic board games, like three unknown mini-campaigns, only in PDF; Only the highest levels will receive the correct cards. But I'm not interested in the $300 luxury scene, not only because it's so expensive, but because most of the extra money goes into the miniature, a game that doesn't even have a miniature tactical.

Basically, I don't get much benefit from this board game. I usually do this because small board games don't consist of many copies and are often difficult to sell at retail. Even the relatively successful Skyrim Gamefound now boasts nearly 4,000 fans, and tens of thousands of copies of the game are unreleased.

Tobold's Blog

Staying frosty

Frosthaven is known as the largest Kickstarter project with a Kickstarter board game and a budget of up to $13 million. Despite being promised for March 2021, it now appears to be almost a year behind schedule. But as a result of this method and the people behind it who are submitting more information, there is a trend in the discussion of the Frosthaven board game community. I do not endorse Frosthaven Kickstarter nor have I previously placed an order. While I'm interested in the digital version, I have no plans to buy a board game. So what's happening to me or the game?

Frosthaven is a sequel to Glomhaven, currently the top rated board game on the GameGeek board. Frosthaven has a new campaign to create new characters, new gameplay elements, new monsters, new items and more. However, it is basically "More Glomehaven" Frosthaven, you can use your favorite character from Glomehaven in Frosthaven. Aside from some minor tweaks to the rules, the way they play the situation is the same. Frosthaven is the opposite of Glomhaven : The Lions's Mouth, a smaller and more approachable version of Glomhaven. The larger and less accessible version of Frosthaven Gloomhaven comes in a heavy-duty box that's great for your desk.

That's too much for most people. Frosthaven can be a great game, but do I need 138 other conditions to play? For most brands, 25 conditions in a Lion's Jaw can be enough. The first 95 scenes from Glomhaven are also out of place, and the Forgotten Club expansion includes 20 more scenes. How many conditions do you need to bring the game of "my favorite board game" to life?

My advice to many gamers is to try Lion's Jaw if you're looking for a board game and play Gloomhaven Digital if you're a single player (I'm working on it right now). Play it to the end and ask yourself if you really want more. Supplements are not always good when the original will do.

Tobold's blog

Not much spillover

Skyrim is one of the best-selling video games in history, selling more than 30 million copies. Of course, the creators of the Skyrim board games are hoping for a distribution, and video game fans will want to buy the board game. But about two weeks after the campaign began, it received only 4,578 people. With prizes of over a million dollars, it's not bad for a table game campaign. But I think the campaign company has high expectations. The trailer received 20,000 views on the company channel and 250,000 viewers on the IGN channel, but apparently had no bite.

My personal belief is that if Modifius had created a physical prototype of the game and placed it on YouTube in the top 10 board game channels, the fundraising campaign would have been much better. Although these channels have few subscribers, I have noticed that the table games played on these channels are doing well on many people's financial platforms. Right now I'm playing on the excellent Sleeping Gods game board, with lots of prototypes and 12,000 fans on Kickstarter. Skyrim board games do not look very appealing to fans of board games available only on the Tablet Simulator. And that does not even convince video game fans to come to the table.

Physical models are no better than tablet simulations or similar virtual versions. The parabola makes the game "more realistic" and consequently there is less trust risk. If you can set up a prototype, it looks like your game is ready, but it might be a good idea or not. For a potential fan, watching a prototype play on YouTube removes a lot of doubt about a fundraising campaign.

Another option that fans might miss is Elder Scrolls V-Sky Skyrim, an adventure game that did not look like a "big" game when I saw it in Tabletop Simulator. I support the basic version because it looks good and is fun to try, but I doubt it will be better than the other games I already own. That's one of the reasons I was not too keen on the $ 300 luxury version of the game. I defend my commitment to this.

Tobold's blog

Board games and math problems

I'm pretty good at math because that's what my degree and my main job require, so I learn more about math than the average person. And if you are good at math, the skills you will acquire is to know if something is a math problem.

Imagine for a second you were transposed into the karmic driven world of Earl. If you have precise information about A and B, or enough equations related to them, you can solve this mathematical problem. For example, if you know that "A - B = 1", "A * B = 6", you can calculate that A must be 3 and B must be 2, so A + B = 5: but if you know that there A match For example, AA, BB are numbers that are determined by a six-sided die roll, not a math problem that can be solved. You can still do the math, for example mentioning that A + B is probably 7, but you won't know for sure what A + B is until you roll the dice.

One of the oldest classifications used for board games is the Ameritras games, which are divided into European games . It is clear that there are many errors in this classification. European games don't have to be made in Europe, ameritrush games don't have to be trash. But often this is the difference. European games are math problems, but not American games.

American-style games are often themed games with a lot of random descriptive elements. If the game allows you to make decisions, those decisions determine which pages of the story book to read or which story cards to read, which is not a mathematical problem unless you know the contents of the whole book or the whole deck. Story card (what you shouldn't do). And that means your math skills can be used to make smart decisions ("If I did, I'd have to roll 5 or more of those two six-sided dice, it would probably work"), but there's still a lack of motivation. I know what will happen. Sometimes everyone at the table laughs or sighs when you finally get 2 with those two dice.

European-style games often have little to no randomness, no storybooks or cards with unfamiliar content, and little or no player interaction. The words "stuffing" or "table building" are used to describe games where the player chooses an action knowing exactly what will happen. Put your staff in this case, * you will get * 2 points. Now the strategy of this game is to create math problems that most people can't solve in their minds. You hire staff to buy resources, you use those resources to buy buildings, buildings build other resources or create new employees, some activities require a certain amount of victory points. In some cases, there is absolutely no match or interaction between the players, so the game is often more cunning or skill based on multiple moves than math, and whoever has the most points wins in the end. Obviously, if you perform exactly the same sequence of moves in the next game, the chances or interactions of the players will not affect the outcome, your winning points will remain the same. The results are determined.

Now computer math is much better than humans. If you're playing European-style determining games, computers can solve equations, determine the best order of moves, or quickly learn how to optimize with some machine learning algorithms. You can't beat the computer in this game. Although people rarely play European games against the computer, it happens that people play these games against someone who has played them more often than before. And if machines can learn the best order of movement, humans can learn it too. Generally more experienced players at least know which moves are better than others, even if they have not mastered the whole sequence of the best moves.

I don't really like European games. I know them as math problems and for fun I don’t like to solve math problems. With the determining nature of the game "John suggests a game at the table because it's his favorite game, other players don't know the game" until "John wins". I also noticed that the action game "I put an employee here to get 2 grand" was frustrating at first because there is no opening and no luck. I like to play dice or read story book page 127 / storyboard page 127 because I don't know what the result will be. So every step of my favorite American-style storytelling game is a test. No need to win after passing X, I like collaborative play.

However, most games do not fit 100% into any one of these categories. Classic European-style games like Settler of Catan have dice to determine the advantage of assets in direct interaction of players with riders, so they are not completely determinants. However, I still prefer American style / narrative / themed games. I would rather describe "I put my partner on the farm - 2 grand to power" than "I take my hero to the side of the ogre, roll a few dice to see if I hit him". However, I like to tackle some minor resources and random mitigation options in my games. I really liked the god of sleep with whom my wife and I played, except for every step that started with putting a crew on one side of the ship. I like that I don’t know what will happen if I decide to go somewhere. But I like that if a fight starts, for example, I have no luck, I can use some of my command points to deactivate it, or by managing my fatigue wounds carefully, I can make it more probable in battle. Victory I don't want my game to be a math problem where I have to calculate 3 steps ahead, but I'm good at the small amount of math involved in guessing the possibility of a die roll.

Tobold's blog

Miniatures and board games

I do not hate sketches. I bought some 3D printers that could make thumbnails for my D&D games, COVID made it difficult to play the games in the real world and we switched to Roll20. So I printed a lot of orcs and saw that a single color 3D printed thumbnail is much better than a simple 2D color drawing on a game board. So I started hating miniature in board games. To explain why, let's take a look at the box office photo of Kingdom Death: Monsters.

You see? Lots of unassembled plastic parts. This has 3 consequences: 1) Kingdom Death: Monsters cost only about $ 400 for the main box; 2) If you can not assemble complex small plastic parts into real miniatures, you will not be able to play; and 3) if you can not draw thumbnail, the end result will not look better than monochrome 3D printed thumbnail. Now these 3 problems have different degrees in different games. Some come with already composite miniatures. Some have even painted it, but it is obviously more expensive.

The bottom line is that there are some board games I can play if they came with cardboard stands instead of miniatures. But there are thumbnails and only small pictures that prevent me from getting the game. I find the idea of ​​Kingdom Death: Monster's Settlement Survival Game very interesting (even if it's a little difficult), but I'm sure I would not spend a fortune on something that would take my hours of dirty work to put it all together. do not make. . Some people naturally collect and paint plastic models for fun; but it is certainly not for everyone. Although on the last Kickstarter, 13 people pledged $ 2,500 for the game. I'll wait for the $ 100 carton version that never comes out.

Toboldun's blog

Social contract for board games

Forty years ago, when I was at university, experienced students went to a villa in Switzerland on weekends once a year. He brought board games to these events because they were better played by 7 players. The only problem is that some people do not know what to expect to play the game. We explained the rules of the game, but we did not talk about the social contract. Junta, like diplomacy , is primarily a game of negotiation and betrayal. In order to play well, you need to be able to turn around at the right time while waiting for your friends to play. If we are not ready for this, many couples will break up after the board game because it will lead to real life, believing that they have been betrayed and mistrusted by each other. It's a game I don't play with my friends today, let alone my teammates.

Modern RPGs often have a "zero session", in which social terms to play together are explained. In this way, future conflicts will be avoided, with some people in the group looking for a way, while others want to work differently. This allows us to discuss what kind of behavior is acceptable and what is not. But in board games, I've never heard anyone do that.

My wife and I do not like to compete, so we usually buy board games together. But even then, we should not have the same motivation. To play skillfully, to understand the basic mechanics of the game I want to have a good understanding of complex games. For example, a year ago there was a blog on how to win on the 7th continent ; And sometimes I watch videos that people play without understanding how it works on YouTube and then they give a bad signal because they are too heavy. I find this to be a little annoying.

But then it is difficult to find good sources for board game strategies. I recently started playing the Wingspan digital version , which is great, but I was not fortunate enough to get some good tips on how to play the game better. If you are looking for spreadsheet strategy tips you will find a lot of discussion about which bird to win, but first you do not need to get one of these migratory birds, these tips are not very useful. . After a few games I understood the mechanics of the game to score more than 90 points but I still did not cross the 100-point fence. But 90 points in the game looks like a "competent player level." I saw a designer play Wingspan on YouTube and I got 93 points. I could see how fun it would be to play Wingpan with people playing at that “player skill level”. But I also saw teammates or random guests sitting together and they had very different levels of skill and experience in that game and nothing was fun. Wingspan is a "motor building" game, and if the player builds an engine much worse than the others, the movement will be shorter, provide fewer inputs, and be more fun.

It is easy to see that players often have different experiences and perhaps different motivations in competitive board games. If the player does not know the game better than anyone else and also has the motivation to beat opponents, no one will like him. Team games and the role of pen and paper are much safer. But maybe it would be nice to talk about social contract before the game starts.

Tobolld Blog