Senin, 30 Mei 2022

The Twitterocalypse

As far as I know , Elon Musk is a brilliant man who is everywhere in politics without talking to that man. For example, he defends a very complex universal income, but he is against the destruction of culture, which is very true. However, if you look at what other people are saying about Elon Musk right now, he's Hitler և he's going to destroy the internet with one hand. He bought Twitter and commented that it would be wrong to block some right-wing politicians and media outlets on Twitter. Donald Trump will most likely buy back his Twitter account.

Interestingly, Twitter has dispelled the old-fashioned idea of ​​being politically neutral, banning only hate speech. The same people behind Trump's ban fear that Twitter * will block their views and candidates. This means that anyone who suddenly controls Twitter, right and left, can gain great political power by blocking some media outlets or changing the algorithms that support them to a more subtle way.

Or it took some time before Elon Musk was actually caught, now in a few days you can see something if the newspaper agrees. The number of right-wing individuals on Twitter ranges from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands. Subscribers. The left loses the followers. This refers to two things. Sleeping people gather in reaction chambers և avoid forums where they may even meet with dissenting opinions. And in public opinion, buying Twitter with Elon Musk means moving to the right.

On January 6, 2021, 2000-2500 supporters of US President Donald Trump attacked the Washington Capitol. Counting the votes in favor of President Joe Biden, who is trying to reverse his defeat in the 2020 presidential election, will be considered a victory. Source: Many people think that Donald Trump is at least partly responsible for this attack, I agree. But in 16 months, what negative impact will the political interests of Donald Trump have? He lost his Twitter account. He's telling you something shocking that he վերականգ can restore his Twitter account. This means that the CEO of Twitter in some cases has more political power than the Congress or the President. And since Twitter (better yet, "was" a public company), that political force is being sold.

The problem is quite simple, but the solution is not clear. In a world that is aimed at appealing to carnal inclinations. In the real world, lawmakers ban books they think are the smartest. Anyone in power at any political level is simply trying to limit the political power of companies that do not agree with them. A month ago, if the Republicans tried to curb the power of Twitter, the Democrats would try to thwart those attempts. The opposite can be true today. Both sides generally agree that some companies have too much power, but never agree on what to do about it, as each side only wants to harm its political opponents.

I do not think that Elon Musk is the worst owner of Twitter և can make the platform more central than it is now. But you do not know this person. It is possible that at some point in his life he announced his candidacy for the presidency of the United States. Does anyone think that owning Twitter would be unfair to such a candidate? And is it surprising that this unjust advantage is not controlled?

PERUBAHAN FISIKA

KATA PENGANTAR: Puji syukur kehadirat Tuhan Yang Maha Esa atas segala limpahan Rahmat, Ina, Taufiq dan Hinaya yang memungkinkan saya untu...